Examine Horizontal Resolution of Dipole-Dipole Array Using Synthetic Models Of 2D and 3D Tomography Techniques

Authors

  • Ahmed S. Al-Zubedi Remote Sensing and Geophysics College, AlKarkh University of Science, Baghdad, IRAQ.
  • Zaidoon T. Abdulrazzaq Space Research and Technology Center, Scientific Research Commission, Baghdad, IRAQ. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0234-0872

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22452/

Keywords:

Horizontal Resolution, Dipole-Dipole Array, 2D and 3D Tomography Techniques

Abstract

The horizontal resolution of the array is the most important factor in accurately mapping subsurface features and ensuring reliable geological interpretations in electrical resistivity surveys. Therefore, six two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) synthetic models were used to assess the horizontal resolution of the Dipole-Dipole array. In each synthetic model, two identical structures with a resistivity of 100Ωm are embedded within a medium of 30Ωm. The horizontal distance between the structures is varied between 2m, 3m, and 4m. The results revealed that the Dipole-Dipole array shows difficulties in delineating the exact location and size of the structures. It provides a distorted image of the structures' locations. It shows better resolution with 2D inverse models compared to 3D inverse models when the horizontal distance becomes small. The sensitivity of this array to the horizontal change in resistivity is increased when the distance between the structures is increased. In the 3D inverse models, Dipole-Dipole array generated a distorted image of the structures when the horizontal distance between the structures is small, while it provides reasonable images when the distance between the structures is increased. So, for investigating a subsurface horizontal structure that is separated with small distances, 2D tomography technique is a better approach than 3D tomography technique when using Dipole-Dipole array.

References

Al-Awsi, M.D. and Abdulrazzaq, Z.T., 2022. Implementing electrical resistivity tomography to delineate soil contamination zone, Southern Baqubah City, Iraq. Kuwait Journal of Science, 49(2), pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.48129/kjs.10674

Al-Hameedawie, M.A., 2013. Comparison between different electrode arrays in delineating aquifer boundary by using 1D and 2D techniques in north Badra area eastern Iraq (Doctoral dissertation, M. Sc. Thesis Department of Geology, college of Science, University of Baghdad, Iraq, 142p).

Al-Khersan, E.H., Al-Ani, J.M. and Abrahem, S.N., 2016. Integrated GPR and ERT as enhanced detection for subsurface historical structures inside Babylonian houses site, Uruk City, southern Iraq. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 173, pp.963-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1162-2

Alpin L.M. 1966. The theory of dipole sounding. In: Dipole Methods for Measuring Earth Conductivity, pp. 1–60. Consult Bureau, New York.

Al‐Zubedi, A.S. and Thabit, J.M., 2016. A comparison between 2D azimuthal and 3D resistivity imaging techniques in determining the subsurface fracture zones within Abu‐Jir Fault Zone, Southwest Karbala, Central Iraq. Near Surface Geophysics, 14(5), pp.413-421. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2016020

Al-Zubedi, A.S. and Thabit, J.M., 2016. Use of 2D azimuthal resistivity imaging in delineation of the fracture characteristics in Dammam aquifer within and out of Abu-Jir fault zone, central Iraq. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9(1), p.22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2070-6

Al-Zubedi, A.S., 2016. Evaluation of five electrode arrays in imaging subsurface shallow targets: A case study. Iraqi Bulletin of Geology and Mining, 12(2), pp.39-46.

Chitea, F. and Georgescu, P., 2009. Sensitivity function for various geoelectric arrays. In Geophysical Research Abstracts. University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics.

Claerbout, J.F. and Muir, F., 1973. Robust modeling with erratic data. Geophysics, 38(5), pp.826-844.

Dahlin, T. and Zhou, B., 2004. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophysical prospecting, 52(5), pp.379-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00423.x

Kallweit, R.S. and Wood, L.C., 1982. The limits of resolution of zero-phase wavelets. Geophysics, 47(7), pp.1035-1046. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441367

Keller, G.V., Frischknecht, F.C., 1966. Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Pergamon Press, London, England, Oxford, 519p.

Kemna, A., Vanderborght, J., Kulessa, B. and Vereecken, H., 2002. Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models. Journal of hydrology, 267(3-4), pp.125-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00145-2

Kunetz, G., 1966. Principles of direct current resistivity prospecting. Borntraeger, Stuttgart, Germany, 106 p.

Loke, M. H., 2012. Tutorial: 2-D and 3D Electrical Imaging Surveys, 172p.

Loke, M. H., 2020. Tutorial: 2-D and 3D Electrical Imaging Surveys, 221p.

Loke, M.H., Chambers, J.E., Rucker, D.F., Kuras, O. and Wilkinson, P.B., 2013. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of applied geophysics, 95, pp.135-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.02.017

Olayinka, A.I. and Yaramanci, U., 2000. Assessment of the reliability of 2D inversion of apparent resistivity data [Link]. Geophysical Prospecting, 48(2), pp.293-316. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00173.x

Roy, A., and A. Apparao. "Depth of investigation in direct current methods." Geophysics 36, no. 5 (1971): 943-959. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440226

Tamssar, A.H., 2013. An evaluation of the suitability of different electrode arrays for geohydrological studies in karoo rocks using electrical resistivity tomography (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State).

Thabit, J.M. and Al-Zubedi, A.S., 2015. Evaluation of three important electrode arrays in defining the vertical and horizontal structures in 2D imaging surveys. Iraqi Journal of Science, pp.1465-1470.

Zhou, Q.Y., Matsui, H. and Shimada, J., 2004. Characterization of the unsaturated zone around a cavity in fractured rocks using electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 42(S1), pp.25-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680409500044

Zhou, W., Beck, B.F. and Adams, A.L., 2002. Effective electrode array in mapping karst hazards in electrical resistivity tomography. Environmental geology, 42, pp.922-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-002-0594-z

Published

30-06-2026

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)